Applications of Linear Models
| Сайт: | Young Education |
| Курс: | Linear Equations and Inequalities |
| Книга: | Applications of Linear Models |
| Надруковано: | Guest user |
| Дата: | понеділок 9 листопада 2026 16:37 PM |
1. Modeling with Linear Equations
Learning outcomes
- I can identify situations that can be modeled linearly.
- I can define variables and relationships in a model.
- I can create linear equations from real-world data.
- I can use models to make predictions.
- I can evaluate the accuracy of a linear model.
2. Modeling with Inequalities
Learning outcomes
- I can create inequalities to represent constraints.
- I can interpret feasible solution sets.
- I can solve real-world inequality problems.
- I can represent solutions graphically.
- I can justify conclusions using inequality models.
Modeling with Inequalities
Many real-world situations involve limits, requirements, ranges, and constraints rather than one exact value. In these situations, an equation may not be enough.
For example, suppose a school bus can carry at most 48 students.
If n represents the number of students, the situation can be modeled as:
n ≤ 48
This inequality does not describe one possible value. It describes an entire solution set:
0, 1, 2, 3, ..., 48
In a realistic context, n must also be a whole number because we cannot have part of a student.
Inequality models help us answer questions such as:
- How much can we spend without exceeding a budget?
- How many items must be sold to reach a target?
- What measurements are within an acceptable range?
- How much weight can a vehicle safely carry?
- How many hours can someone work?
- Which possible solutions satisfy all of the restrictions?
Equations and Inequalities in Models
An equation represents two quantities that are exactly equal.
For example:
C = 5n + 20
might describe a cost consisting of a $20 starting fee plus $5 per item.
An inequality describes a range of possible values.
If the maximum budget is $100:
5n + 20 ≤ 100
The inequality now asks:
Which values of n keep the total cost at or below $100?
What Is a Constraint?
A constraint is a condition that limits the possible solutions to a problem.
Common constraints include:
- maximum cost
- minimum score
- available time
- limited materials
- weight capacity
- minimum age
- maximum occupancy
- acceptable temperature range
- required production level
Constraints are often represented using inequalities.
Translating Words into Inequality Symbols
Understanding the language of constraints is essential.
| Words or Phrases | Symbol |
|---|---|
| greater than | > |
| more than | > |
| exceeds | > |
| less than | < |
| fewer than | < |
| below | < |
| at least | ≥ |
| minimum | ≥ |
| no less than | ≥ |
| at most | ≤ |
| maximum | ≤ |
| no more than | ≤ |
| cannot exceed | ≤ |
The phrases at least and at most are especially important.
At Least
At least 12
means:
12 is allowed, and values greater than 12 are allowed.
Therefore:
x ≥ 12
For example:
"A student must score at least 70%."
Let s represent the score.
s ≥ 70
A score of exactly 70% satisfies the requirement.
At Most
At most 12
means:
12 is allowed, and values below 12 are allowed.
Therefore:
x ≤ 12
For example:
"A bag may weigh at most 20 kg."
Let w represent its mass.
w ≤ 20
Exactly 20 kg is acceptable.
Strict Inequalities
Sometimes the boundary itself is not allowed.
"Temperature must be below 30°C."
T < 30
"Applicants must be older than 16."
a > 16
The symbols < and > indicate that the boundary value is excluded.
Defining Variables
Before creating an inequality, define the unknown quantity.
Suppose:
"A concert ticket costs $15, and you have $90."
Define:
n = number of tickets purchased
The total cost is:
15n
The available money creates the constraint:
15n ≤ 90
Clearly defining the variable makes the model easier to interpret.
Creating an Inequality Model
A useful modeling process is:
- identify the unknown quantity
- define a variable
- identify the constraint
- decide which inequality symbol represents the constraint
- write the mathematical expression
- solve the inequality
- interpret the solution in context
- check whether additional restrictions apply
The final interpretation is just as important as the algebra.
Budget Constraints
Suppose you have:
$80
A movie ticket costs:
$12
Let:
n = number of tickets
The constraint is:
12n ≤ 80
Solve:
n ≤ 80/12
n ≤ 6.67 approximately
Mathematically:
n ≤ 6.67
But tickets are discrete objects.
Therefore, the realistic conclusion is:
You can buy at most 6 tickets.
Fixed and Variable Costs
Many cost problems include both:
- a fixed cost
- a variable cost
Suppose a club charges:
- $25 registration fee
- $8 per visit
You have:
$100
Let:
v = number of visits
Total cost:
25 + 8v
Budget constraint:
25 + 8v ≤ 100
Solve:
8v ≤ 75
v ≤ 9.375
Because visits are whole numbers:
v ≤ 9
Therefore, you can afford at most 9 visits.
Minimum Requirements
Inequalities also model situations where a quantity must reach or exceed a minimum.
Suppose a student needs at least:
240 points
to earn an award.
The student already has:
165 points
and earns:
15 points per activity
Let:
a = number of additional activities
Model:
165 + 15a ≥ 240
Subtract 165:
15a ≥ 75
Divide by 15:
a ≥ 5
The student must complete:
at least 5 additional activities.
Why Rounding Depends on the Situation
Suppose a calculation gives:
n ≥ 4.2
and n represents the number of workers required.
Using 4 workers would not satisfy the requirement.
Therefore:
at least 5 workers are required
We round upward because the constraint is a minimum.
Now suppose:
n ≤ 4.8
and n represents the number of tickets that can be purchased.
The greatest possible whole number is:
4
We cannot round to 5 because 5 would violate the constraint.
When interpreting inequalities, do not simply use ordinary rounding rules. Choose a value that still satisfies the inequality.
Capacity Constraints
Suppose an elevator can safely carry:
900 kg
Six passengers and their luggage already have a combined mass of:
510 kg
Additional boxes each have a mass of:
35 kg
Let:
b = number of boxes
The model is:
510 + 35b ≤ 900
Subtract 510:
35b ≤ 390
Divide by 35:
b ≤ 11.14 approximately
Because b must be a whole number:
b ≤ 11
The elevator can carry at most 11 additional boxes under this model.
Checking the Conclusion
Check 11 boxes:
510 + 35(11)
= 510 + 385
= 895 kg
This is acceptable.
Check 12 boxes:
510 + 35(12)
= 510 + 420
= 930 kg
This exceeds the limit.
Therefore, 11 is the greatest feasible number.
Feasible Solutions
A feasible solution is a value that satisfies all of the constraints in a problem.
For:
510 + 35b ≤ 900
b = 8 is feasible.
Check:
510 + 35(8) = 790
790 ≤ 900
True.
But:
b = 15
is not feasible.
510 + 35(15) = 1035
1035 ≤ 900
False.
A solution can be mathematically possible in general but infeasible under the stated constraints.
The Feasible Solution Set
The feasible solution set contains all values that satisfy the constraints.
Suppose:
x ≥ 4
and x can be any real number.
The feasible set includes:
4, 4.1, 5, 7.8, 100, ...
In interval notation:
[4, ∞)
If x instead represents a number of people, then only appropriate whole-number values are meaningful:
4, 5, 6, 7, ...
Context determines which values in the mathematical solution set are actually feasible.
Graphing Inequality Solutions
Solutions to one-variable inequalities can be represented on a number line.
For:
x > 3
use:
- an open circle at 3
- shading to the right
For:
x ≥ 3
use:
- a closed circle at 3
- shading to the right
For:
x < 3
use:
- an open circle at 3
- shading to the left
For:
x ≤ 3
use:
- a closed circle at 3
- shading to the left
Open and Closed Circles
Use an open circle when the boundary is not included.
Examples:
x < 5
x > −2
Use a closed circle when the boundary is included.
Examples:
x ≤ 5
x ≥ −2
A useful question is:
"Is the boundary value allowed?"
If yes, use a closed circle.
If no, use an open circle.
Direction on a Number Line
For:
x > 4
the solutions are greater than 4, so the graph extends right.
For:
x < 4
the solutions are less than 4, so the graph extends left.
Do not rely only on memorized arrow rules. Read the inequality:
x > 4
means:
x is greater than 4.
Compound Constraints
Many real-world situations have both a minimum and maximum.
Suppose a machine operates safely between:
40°C and 70°C, inclusive
The model is:
40 ≤ T ≤ 70
The feasible solution set contains all temperatures from 40°C through 70°C.
Both endpoints are included.
Graphing a Range
For:
40 ≤ T ≤ 70
the number line has:
- closed circle at 40
- closed circle at 70
- shading between them
In interval notation:
[40, 70]
This represents a bounded feasible region.
When Boundaries Are Excluded
Suppose a chemical process requires:
pH greater than 5 but less than 9
Then:
5 < pH < 9
The endpoints are excluded.
Interval notation:
(5, 9)
The number line uses open circles at both 5 and 9.
Multiple Constraints
Suppose a competition requires participants to be:
- at least 12 years old
- no older than 17
Let:
a = age
The constraints are:
a ≥ 12
and:
a ≤ 17
Combined:
12 ≤ a ≤ 17
The feasible ages are those satisfying both conditions.
"And" Constraints
When two conditions must both be satisfied, we use the idea of and.
For example:
x ≥ 2
and:
x ≤ 8
Combined:
2 ≤ x ≤ 8
The feasible region is the overlap of the two solution sets.
A useful reminder is:
AND = OVERLAP
"Or" Constraints
Sometimes either condition may be satisfied.
Suppose a machine automatically shuts down when:
T < 5°C or T > 90°C
The model is:
T < 5 or T > 90
The solution contains two separate regions.
A useful reminder is:
OR = COMBINE
Solving an Inequality Model
Suppose a delivery company charges:
$18 fixed fee
plus:
$4 per kilometre
You can spend no more than:
$70
Let:
d = distance in kilometres
Model:
18 + 4d ≤ 70
Subtract 18:
4d ≤ 52
Divide by 4:
d ≤ 13
The maximum distance you can afford is:
13 km
Verifying the Boundary
Check d = 13:
18 + 4(13)
= 18 + 52
= 70
This exactly matches the budget.
Because the inequality uses ≤, the boundary is included.
Therefore:
13 km is feasible.
A Minimum Earnings Problem
A worker needs to earn at least:
$500
The worker receives a fixed payment of:
$80
plus:
$28/hour
Let:
h = hours worked
Model:
80 + 28h ≥ 500
Subtract 80:
28h ≥ 420
Divide by 28:
h ≥ 15
The worker must work at least:
15 hours
to meet the target.
A Time Constraint
A student has:
120 minutes
to complete homework.
Math requires approximately:
35 minutes
and each science problem takes:
5 minutes
Let:
p = number of science problems
Model:
35 + 5p ≤ 120
Subtract 35:
5p ≤ 85
Divide by 5:
p ≤ 17
The student can complete at most 17 science problems within the available time under this model.
Inequalities with Negative Rates
Suppose a freezer begins at:
12°C
and cools by:
3°C per hour.
Its temperature is:
T = 12 − 3h
Suppose the freezer must reach:
T ≤ −6°C
Model:
12 − 3h ≤ −6
Subtract 12:
−3h ≤ −18
Divide by −3.
Because we divide by a negative number, reverse the inequality:
h ≥ 6
The freezer needs at least:
6 hours
to reach −6°C or colder.
Why the Inequality Reverses
Whenever both sides of an inequality are multiplied or divided by a negative number, the inequality sign must reverse.
For example:
3 < 7
Multiply both sides by −1:
−3 > −7
The order reverses on the number line.
This rule applies to inequality models exactly as it does to purely algebraic inequalities.
Realistic Restrictions
Suppose algebra gives:
n ≤ 8.5
If n represents the number of boxes:
n cannot be:
- negative
- fractional
Therefore, the realistic feasible set might be:
n = 0, 1, 2, ..., 8
The algebraic solution and the contextual solution are related but not always identical.
Non-Negative Constraints
Many quantities cannot realistically be negative.
Examples include:
- number of people
- number of tickets
- distance travelled
- mass
- number of products
- time after an event begins
Therefore, a model may need an additional constraint such as:
x ≥ 0
Suppose:
x ≤ 12
and x represents items produced.
A more complete model is:
0 ≤ x ≤ 12
Whole-Number Constraints
Some variables must be whole numbers.
Suppose:
n = number of buses
Then:
n = 0, 1, 2, 3, ...
A solution such as:
n ≥ 3.4
must be interpreted as:
n ≥ 4
for the practical situation.
This is different from a continuous quantity such as time, where 3.4 hours may be perfectly meaningful.
Continuous Constraints
Suppose:
t = time in hours
and:
t ≤ 3.4
A value such as:
3.25 hours
is possible.
Therefore, the entire interval may be feasible.
This distinction between discrete and continuous variables is important when interpreting inequality solutions.
Modeling Acceptable Measurement Ranges
Suppose a manufactured rod should be:
50 cm
long, with an acceptable variation of:
±0.2 cm
The minimum acceptable length is:
50 − 0.2 = 49.8 cm
The maximum acceptable length is:
50 + 0.2 = 50.2 cm
Therefore:
49.8 ≤ L ≤ 50.2
A rod measuring:
50.1 cm
is feasible.
A rod measuring:
50.4 cm
is not.
Testing a Feasible Value
For:
49.8 ≤ L ≤ 50.2
test:
L = 50.15
Check:
49.8 ≤ 50.15 ≤ 50.2
True.
Therefore:
50.15 cm is acceptable.
Testing candidate values is an effective way to justify a conclusion.
Testing an Infeasible Value
Test:
L = 49.6
Check:
49.8 ≤ 49.6 ≤ 50.2
False.
Therefore:
49.6 cm is outside the acceptable range.
A strong justification includes both the inequality and the comparison.
Using Inequalities for Decision-Making
Suppose two venues have capacities:
Venue A: 250 people
Venue B: 400 people
An event expects:
320 people
Venue A requires:
n ≤ 250
But:
320 ≤ 250
is false.
Venue B requires:
n ≤ 400
and:
320 ≤ 400
is true.
Therefore, Venue B satisfies the capacity constraint while Venue A does not.
Multiple Real-World Constraints
Suppose a delivery truck can carry:
- no more than 2,000 kg
- no more than 100 boxes
Let:
n = number of boxes
If each box weighs 25 kg, the mass constraint is:
25n ≤ 2000
Solve:
n ≤ 80
The box-count constraint is:
n ≤ 100
Both must be satisfied.
Therefore:
n ≤ 80
The mass restriction is the limiting constraint.
Limiting Constraints
When several constraints apply, the limiting constraint is the one that restricts the feasible solution most strongly.
In the previous example:
mass allows at most 80 boxes
space/count allows at most 100 boxes
Therefore:
80 boxes
is the practical maximum.
The truck may have space for more boxes, but it reaches its mass limit first.
Comparing Constraints
Suppose a workshop has enough:
Material A for:
n ≤ 120
Material B for:
n ≤ 85
Labor time for:
n ≤ 100
All constraints must be satisfied.
Therefore:
n ≤ 85
Material B is the limiting resource.
Feasible Regions with Two Variables
Some models involve two unknown quantities.
Suppose a student buys notebooks and pens.
Let:
n = number of notebooks
p = number of pens
A notebook costs $4.
A pen costs $2.
The student has no more than $20.
The budget constraint is:
4n + 2p ≤ 20
There are many possible solutions.
Examples include:
(0, 10)
(2, 6)
(3, 4)
(4, 2)
(5, 0)
as well as other combinations that cost less than $20.
Boundary Lines
For a two-variable inequality such as:
4n + 2p ≤ 20
the related boundary equation is:
4n + 2p = 20
Points on this line use the entire $20 budget.
Points on the appropriate side of the line represent combinations that cost less than $20.
Together, these form a solution region.
Testing a Point
Consider:
4n + 2p ≤ 20
Test:
(n, p) = (2, 4)
Substitute:
4(2) + 2(4) ≤ 20
8 + 8 ≤ 20
16 ≤ 20
True.
Therefore:
(2, 4) is feasible.
Now test:
(4, 4)
4(4) + 2(4) ≤ 20
16 + 8 ≤ 20
24 ≤ 20
False.
Therefore:
(4, 4) is not feasible.
Graphical Solution Regions
For a two-variable inequality, the graph contains an entire region rather than just one line.
A typical process is:
- graph the boundary line
- determine whether the boundary is included
- test a point
- shade the side satisfying the inequality
- consider additional contextual restrictions
For quantities such as numbers of notebooks and pens, we also require:
n ≥ 0
p ≥ 0
and normally whole-number values.
Solid and Dashed Boundary Lines
For:
y ≤ 2x + 3
the boundary is included.
Use a solid line.
For:
y < 2x + 3
the boundary is excluded.
Use a dashed line.
Similarly:
≥ or ≤ → solid boundary
or < → dashed boundary
This is the two-dimensional equivalent of closed and open circles on a number line.
Overlapping Constraints
Suppose a problem has:
y ≤ 2x + 6
and:
y ≥ x + 1
Each inequality creates its own solution region.
The feasible region is where the two shaded regions overlap.
A point must satisfy every constraint to be feasible.
Justifying a Conclusion
A strong mathematical conclusion should do more than state an answer.
Instead of:
"They can buy 7."
write:
"The model gives n ≤ 7.5. Because n represents whole items, the greatest feasible value is 7. Buying 8 would exceed the budget, so 7 is the maximum."
This connects:
- the model
- the algebra
- the context
- the conclusion
Justifying with Substitution
Suppose a van has a maximum load of:
750 kg
The van already contains:
430 kg
Each crate weighs:
45 kg
Model:
430 + 45c ≤ 750
Solving gives:
45c ≤ 320
c ≤ 7.11 approximately
Therefore:
c ≤ 7
Check 7:
430 + 45(7) = 745
Feasible.
Check 8:
430 + 45(8) = 790
Not feasible.
Therefore, 7 crates is the maximum, and substitution verifies the conclusion.
Evaluating the Model Itself
Even a correctly solved inequality may rely on assumptions.
In the van example, the model assumes:
- every crate weighs exactly 45 kg
- the existing load is exactly 430 kg
- the stated maximum load is correct
- no other load is added
If actual crate masses vary, a safety margin may be necessary.
Mathematical models should always be interpreted within their assumptions.
Safety Constraints
In safety-related situations, exceeding a limit may have serious consequences.
For example:
m ≤ 750 kg
means 750 kg is the maximum safe mass.
A calculated value of:
749.9 kg
may mathematically satisfy the model.
However, measurement uncertainty could make operating so close to the limit unwise.
Real engineering decisions may include additional safety factors beyond the simplified inequality.
A Complete Modeling Example
A school is planning a trip.
A bus costs:
$250 fixed fee
plus:
$12 per student
The school has a maximum transportation budget of:
$850
Let:
n = number of students
Model:
250 + 12n ≤ 850
Subtract 250:
12n ≤ 600
Divide by 12:
n ≤ 50
Therefore:
at most 50 students can attend under this transportation budget.
Checking the Boundary
For 50 students:
250 + 12(50)
= 250 + 600
= 850
This exactly matches the budget.
For 51 students:
250 + 12(51)
= 250 + 612
= 862
This exceeds the budget.
Therefore, 50 is the maximum feasible number.
Adding Another Constraint
Suppose the bus itself can carry only:
46 students
Now there are two constraints:
Budget:
n ≤ 50
Capacity:
n ≤ 46
Both must be satisfied.
Therefore:
n ≤ 46
The bus capacity becomes the limiting constraint.
Adding a Minimum Requirement
Suppose the trip will only run if at least:
30 students
participate.
Now:
n ≥ 30
and:
n ≤ 46
Combined:
30 ≤ n ≤ 46
Because n represents students, the feasible solution set consists of whole numbers:
30, 31, 32, ..., 46
Interpreting the Feasible Set
The solution:
30 ≤ n ≤ 46
does not mean there is one correct number of students.
It means every whole-number value from 30 through 46 satisfies all of the constraints.
That entire collection is the feasible solution set.
This is one of the major differences between equation models and inequality models.
A Reliable Modeling Strategy
When modeling a real-world situation with inequalities:
- Read the situation carefully.
- Identify the unknown quantity or quantities.
- Define variables and units.
- Identify every constraint.
- Translate words such as "at least" and "at most" carefully.
- Write an inequality for each constraint.
- Solve the inequalities.
- Reverse the inequality sign if multiplying or dividing by a negative.
- Identify the feasible solution set.
- Apply contextual restrictions such as non-negative or whole-number values.
- Represent the solution graphically when useful.
- Test important boundary values.
- Identify the limiting constraint when several constraints apply.
- Interpret the answer in words.
- Verify that the conclusion satisfies every constraint.
- Consider whether the model's assumptions are reasonable.
Common Mistakes
Confusing "at least" and "at most"
At least 10:
x ≥ 10
At most 10:
x ≤ 10
Forgetting that the boundary may be included
"Maximum 50" includes 50:
x ≤ 50
Using ordinary rounding without considering the inequality
If:
n ≤ 6.8
and n represents whole items, the maximum is 6, not 7.
Forgetting to reverse the sign
When multiplying or dividing an inequality by a negative number, reverse the inequality symbol.
Ignoring realistic restrictions
A solution such as:
n = −4 people
may satisfy part of an algebraic expression but is not meaningful in context.
Ignoring whole-number restrictions
People, buses, boxes, and tickets are usually discrete.
Checking only one constraint
A feasible solution must satisfy all applicable constraints.
Confusing the boundary with the feasible region
For a two-variable inequality, the boundary line is only part of the solution when equality is allowed. The solution usually includes an entire region.
Using a solid boundary for a strict inequality
< and > use dashed boundaries.
≤ and ≥ use solid boundaries.
Giving an answer without justification
A conclusion should be supported using the inequality, solution, context, and preferably a boundary check.
Key Terms
Inequality model — mathematical representation of a real-world constraint using inequality symbols.
Constraint — condition that limits possible solutions.
Feasible solution — value or combination of values satisfying all constraints.
Feasible solution set — collection of all values satisfying the constraints.
Feasible region — graphical region containing solutions satisfying all constraints.
Boundary — value separating solutions from non-solutions.
Boundary line — line separating solution and non-solution regions in a two-variable inequality.
Strict inequality — inequality using < or >, where the boundary is excluded.
Inclusive inequality — inequality using ≤ or ≥, where the boundary is included.
Compound inequality — combination of two inequality conditions.
Limiting constraint — constraint that places the strongest restriction on the feasible solutions.
Discrete variable — variable that takes separate countable values.
Continuous variable — variable that can take any value within an interval.
Domain restriction — limitation on values that are meaningful or allowed.
Solution region — part of a graph representing values satisfying an inequality.
Open circle — number-line symbol showing that a boundary value is excluded.
Closed circle — number-line symbol showing that a boundary value is included.
Solid boundary line — boundary included in a two-variable inequality.
Dashed boundary line — boundary excluded from a two-variable inequality.
Key Takeaways
- Inequalities are useful for modeling limits, requirements, ranges, and constraints.
- Equations usually describe exact relationships, while inequalities describe sets of possible values.
- A constraint limits which solutions are acceptable.
- "At least" normally translates to ≥.
- "At most" normally translates to ≤.
- "Greater than" and "less than" exclude the boundary.
- Variables should be clearly defined before constructing a model.
- A feasible solution satisfies every applicable constraint.
- The feasible solution set contains all acceptable solutions.
- Context may restrict algebraic solutions to non-negative values, integers, or whole numbers.
- Discrete and continuous variables must be interpreted differently.
- Rounding must preserve the original inequality rather than simply follow ordinary rounding rules.
- Inequality solutions can be represented on number lines.
- Open circles represent excluded boundaries.
- Closed circles represent included boundaries.
- Compound inequalities can represent minimum and maximum limits simultaneously.
- "And" constraints require overlap between solution sets.
- "Or" constraints combine solution regions.
- Two-variable inequalities produce solution regions rather than a single line.
- Solid boundary lines are used when equality is included.
- Dashed boundary lines are used when equality is excluded.
- Multiple constraints create a feasible region where all conditions overlap.
- A limiting constraint determines the strongest practical restriction.
- Substitution can verify whether a proposed solution is feasible.
- A strong conclusion connects the mathematical solution directly to the real-world situation.
- Mathematical feasibility does not automatically guarantee practical safety or usefulness; assumptions and context still matter.
Check Your Understanding
- Write an inequality representing: A package may weigh no more than 25 kg.
- Write an inequality representing: A student must score at least 60 points to pass.
- Explain the difference between x < 8 and x ≤ 8, including how each would be represented on a number line.
- You have $75 to spend on notebooks costing $8 each. Define a variable, create an inequality, solve it, and determine the maximum number of notebooks you can purchase.
- A gym charges a $30 membership fee plus $6 per visit. You have no more than $120 to spend. Create and solve an inequality to determine the maximum number of visits.
- A worker has already earned $180 and earns another $25 per hour. The worker wants to earn at least $500. Create and solve an inequality to determine the minimum number of additional whole hours required.
- An elevator can carry a maximum of 1,000 kg. Its current load is 580 kg. Boxes weighing 32 kg each must be added. Determine the maximum number of whole boxes that can safely be added.
- A machine operates safely when its temperature is at least 35°C and no more than 80°C. Write a compound inequality, describe its number-line graph, and give the corresponding interval notation.
- A freezer begins at 15°C and cools by 4°C each hour. It must reach a temperature of −9°C or colder. Create and solve an inequality to determine how long the freezer must cool.
- A calculation gives n ≤ 12.7, where n represents the number of passengers allowed on a small vehicle. Explain why 13 passengers would not be a valid interpretation.
- A calculation gives n ≥ 6.2, where n represents the number of buses required to transport all students. Determine the minimum feasible number of buses and justify your conclusion.
- A truck can carry at most 2,400 kg and at most 90 containers. Each container has a mass of 30 kg. Write both constraints, determine the maximum feasible number of containers, and identify the limiting constraint.
- A student has $30 to purchase notebooks costing $5 each and pens costing $2 each. Let n represent notebooks and p represent pens. Write a two-variable inequality representing the budget. Determine whether (4, 5) is feasible and justify your answer.
- A manufacturing process requires a component length to be 25.0 ± 0.15 mm. Write a compound inequality representing acceptable lengths. Determine whether components measuring 24.82 mm, 24.90 mm, and 25.14 mm are acceptable.
- A school trip requires at least 24 students to run. A bus holds no more than 42 students. Transportation costs a fixed $180 plus $14 per student, and the school has a maximum budget of $750. Define a variable, create all relevant inequalities, solve each constraint, determine the complete feasible solution set, identify the limiting upper constraint, and justify the maximum number of students who can attend.
3. Systems of Linear Equations (Introduction)
Learning outcomes
- I can explain what a system of linear equations is.
- I can identify solutions to systems graphically.
- I can interpret intersection points as solutions.
- I can solve simple systems using graphing methods.
- I can apply systems of equations to real-world situations.
4. Linear Modeling Projects
Learning outcomes
- I can collect and organize data for a linear model.
- I can determine whether a linear relationship exists.
- I can create equations and graphs from data.
- I can communicate findings using mathematical evidence.
- I can evaluate strengths and limitations of my model.
Linear Modeling Projects
A linear modeling project uses real or collected data to investigate whether two variables have an approximately linear relationship. Instead of being given an equation, you begin with observations or measurements and develop a mathematical model from the evidence.
A complete project usually follows this process:
question → variables → data collection → table → graph → linear model → predictions → evaluation → conclusion
This brings together many important mathematical skills:
- collecting and organizing data
- identifying variables
- constructing tables and graphs
- calculating rates of change
- writing linear equations
- making predictions
- interpreting slope and intercept
- evaluating model accuracy
- communicating conclusions using mathematical evidence
The goal is not simply to find an equation. A strong project explains what the equation means, how well it represents the data, and when it should or should not be trusted.
Beginning with a Research Question
A good modeling project begins with a clear, measurable question involving two variables.
Examples include:
- How does walking distance change with time?
- How does the height of a burning candle change with time?
- How does the amount of water in a container change as water is added?
- How does taxi cost change with distance?
- How does the circumference of a circular object relate to its diameter?
- How does the total mass of identical objects change with the number of objects?
- How does the length of a spring change as load is added within its elastic range?
A useful question identifies quantities that can actually be measured or recorded.
Choosing a Question Suitable for Linear Modeling
Not every investigation should produce a linear relationship.
A good candidate for linear modeling usually involves a quantity changing at an approximately constant rate.
For example:
How does distance travelled change with time when a cart moves at approximately constant speed?
If the speed remains approximately constant:
distance = speed × time
The relationship should be linear.
In contrast:
How does the area of a square change with side length?
is not linear because:
A = s²
A linear model would not appropriately represent the complete relationship.
Defining the Variables
Every project should clearly define its variables.
Suppose the investigation asks:
How does the amount of water in a container change as water is added?
Possible variables are:
x = number of cups of water added
y = total volume of water in mL
The variables should include:
- a clear name
- a symbol
- appropriate units
This makes later graphs and equations much easier to interpret.
Independent and Dependent Variables
The independent variable is the quantity deliberately changed, selected, or used as the input.
The dependent variable is the quantity measured or observed in response.
For a walking experiment:
Independent variable: time (s)
Dependent variable: distance travelled (m)
Distance depends on how much time has passed.
In most graphs:
- independent variable → x-axis
- dependent variable → y-axis
Planning Data Collection
Before collecting data, decide:
- what will be measured
- which units will be used
- how measurements will be made
- how many observations will be collected
- what range of values will be investigated
- how results will be recorded
- whether repeated measurements are needed
Good planning improves the reliability of the resulting model.
Collecting Enough Data
A linear model should not normally be based on only two measurements.
Two points always determine a straight line mathematically, but they do not provide much evidence that the real relationship is actually linear.
A project should usually collect several data points across a useful range.
For example:
| Time (s) | Distance (m) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0.1 |
| 2 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 6.2 |
| 6 | 9.1 |
| 8 | 12.3 |
| 10 | 15.0 |
The data does not need to be perfectly linear.
Real measurements commonly contain variation.
Why Real Data Is Often Imperfect
Even when the underlying relationship is linear, measurements may not lie perfectly on one line.
Variation can result from:
- measurement uncertainty
- reaction time
- instrument precision
- environmental changes
- inconsistent technique
- natural variation
- recording mistakes
A mathematical model attempts to represent the overall pattern, not necessarily every individual measurement exactly.
Organizing Data in a Table
Data should be organized clearly before it is graphed.
A good table should contain:
- variable names
- units
- consistent precision where appropriate
- observations in a logical order
For example:
| Time (s) | Distance (m) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0.1 |
| 2 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 6.2 |
| 6 | 9.1 |
| 8 | 12.3 |
| 10 | 15.0 |
A reader should be able to understand the data without needing additional explanation.
Looking for a Linear Pattern in a Table
One way to investigate linearity is to compare rates of change.
Using:
(2, 3.0)
and:
(4, 6.2)
the approximate rate is:
m = (6.2 − 3.0)/(4 − 2)
m = 3.2/2
m = 1.6 m/s
Using:
(6, 9.1)
and:
(8, 12.3)
m = (12.3 − 9.1)/(8 − 6)
m = 3.2/2
m = 1.6 m/s
Similar rates provide evidence that the relationship may be approximately linear.
Constant Differences
If x increases by equal amounts, linear data should have approximately constant changes in y.
For example:
| x | y |
|---|---|
| 0 | 5 |
| 1 | 8 |
| 2 | 11 |
| 3 | 14 |
| 4 | 17 |
The first differences are:
+3, +3, +3, +3
This is exactly linear.
Real experimental data might instead produce:
+3.1, +2.8, +3.2, +2.9
The relationship could still be approximately linear.
Unequal x-Intervals
Constant differences in y should only be compared directly when the changes in x are equal.
Consider:
| x | y |
|---|---|
| 1 | 6 |
| 3 | 12 |
| 7 | 24 |
The changes in y are:
+6 and +12
They are not equal.
But the x changes are:
+2 and +4
Calculate rates:
6/2 = 3
12/4 = 3
Therefore:
m = 3
The relationship is linear despite the unequal changes in y.
Always use:
m = Δy/Δx
when x-intervals differ.
Creating a Scatter Plot
A scatter plot displays collected data as individual points.
Each point represents one observation:
(independent variable, dependent variable)
Scatter plots are especially useful for deciding whether data follows an approximately linear pattern.
Look for:
- overall direction
- how closely points follow a straight-line pattern
- unusual points
- clusters
- possible curvature
Positive Linear Relationships
A positive linear relationship generally rises from left to right.
As x increases:
y tends to increase
Examples might include:
- time and distance at constant positive speed
- number of identical items and total cost
- hours worked and earnings
- water added and total volume
The slope is positive.
Negative Linear Relationships
A negative linear relationship generally falls from left to right.
As x increases:
y tends to decrease
Examples might include:
- time and water remaining in a draining tank
- time and candle height while burning steadily
- distance travelled and fuel remaining under simplified conditions
The slope is negative.
Weak or Non-Linear Relationships
If the data points do not form an approximately straight pattern, a linear model may not be appropriate.
For example, the data might:
- curve upward
- curve downward
- level off
- fluctuate randomly
- form separate groups
A project should not force a linear equation onto clearly non-linear data simply because the assignment involves linear modeling.
Recognizing that a linear model is not appropriate can itself be a valid mathematical conclusion.
Creating a Line of Best Fit
Real data often does not lie exactly on one line.
A line of best fit is a straight line that represents the overall trend.
A reasonable line should generally:
- pass through the middle of the data
- follow the overall direction
- have points distributed on both sides
- avoid being controlled by one unusual point
The line does not need to pass through every data point.
In fact, it may pass through very few actual points.
Estimating a Line of Best Fit
Suppose a scatter plot suggests that a reasonable line passes near:
(2, 4)
and:
(10, 20)
Estimate the slope:
m = (20 − 4)/(10 − 2)
m = 16/8
m = 2
If the line crosses the y-axis near:
0
then a possible model is:
y = 2x
This model describes the overall trend rather than every individual measurement.
Choosing Points for the Model
When estimating an equation from a line of best fit, choose two clear points on the fitted line.
They do not necessarily need to be original data points.
Using points far apart on the fitted line often reduces the effect of small reading errors when calculating slope.
Writing the Linear Model
Once the slope and intercept are estimated, use:
y = mx + b
Suppose:
m ≈ 2.4
b ≈ 5
Then:
y ≈ 2.4x + 5
The symbol ≈ is useful when the equation is an approximate model rather than an exact relationship.
Interpreting the Slope
The slope should always be explained in context.
Suppose:
d ≈ 1.5t + 0.2
where:
d = distance in metres
t = time in seconds
The slope is:
1.5 m/s
A useful interpretation is:
The object's distance increases by approximately 1.5 m for every additional second.
This is much more informative than simply stating:
m = 1.5
Interpreting the Intercept
For:
d ≈ 1.5t + 0.2
the intercept is:
0.2 m
This means the model predicts that at:
t = 0
the distance is approximately:
0.2 m
Depending on the experiment, this might represent:
- an actual starting position
- measurement uncertainty
- an offset in the experimental setup
- limitations in the fitted model
The intercept should be interpreted rather than simply reported.
When the Intercept Has Little Practical Meaning
Suppose a model relating height to age is:
h = 4.8a + 75
Mathematically, the intercept is:
75 cm
But if the data was collected only from children aged 8–12 years, using the equation at age zero may not be appropriate.
The y-intercept is mathematically part of the line but may lie outside the meaningful domain of the data.
Using the Model to Make Predictions
Suppose a model is:
d = 1.5t + 0.2
Predict the distance after:
t = 12 s
Substitute:
d = 1.5(12) + 0.2
d = 18 + 0.2
d = 18.2 m
The model predicts a distance of approximately:
18.2 m
Interpolation
An interpolation is a prediction within the range of collected data.
Suppose measurements were collected from:
0 to 20 seconds.
Predicting the distance at:
13 seconds
is interpolation.
Because the prediction lies within the measured range, it is often relatively reliable if the model fits the data well.
Extrapolation
An extrapolation is a prediction outside the measured range.
If data was collected from:
0 to 20 seconds
and the model is used to predict the value at:
60 seconds,
that is extrapolation.
The prediction assumes the relationship continues beyond the region where it was observed.
This assumption may be incorrect.
Evaluating Prediction Reliability
Ask:
- Is the prediction inside the data range?
- How far outside the data range is it?
- Does the linear trend have a reason to continue?
- Are there physical limits?
- Could conditions change?
- Is the predicted value realistic?
A calculated prediction should never automatically be accepted simply because it came from an equation.
Comparing Predicted and Observed Values
Suppose the model predicts:
24.5
but an actual measurement is:
25.2
The difference is:
25.2 − 24.5 = 0.7
This difference helps us evaluate the model.
A model does not need to predict every measurement exactly to be useful.
The important question is whether the errors are reasonably small for the purpose of the investigation.
Residuals
A residual measures the difference between an observed value and the model's prediction.
Use:
residual = observed value − predicted value
Suppose:
observed = 18.7
predicted = 18.2
Then:
residual = 18.7 − 18.2
residual = 0.5
The positive residual means the observed value lies 0.5 units above the model's prediction.
Interpreting Residuals
If:
residual > 0
the observed value is above the prediction.
If:
residual < 0
the observed value is below the prediction.
If:
residual = 0
the model predicts the observation exactly.
Smaller residual magnitudes generally indicate that the model fits the observations more closely.
Residual Patterns
Residuals should not merely be examined individually.
Look for patterns.
If residuals appear randomly above and below zero, a linear model may be reasonable.
If residuals show a clear pattern such as:
positive → negative → positive
or steadily become larger,
the relationship may not be truly linear.
A curved pattern in residuals is evidence that another model may fit better.
Outliers
An outlier is a data point that lies unusually far from the general pattern.
Possible causes include:
- measurement error
- recording error
- unusual experimental conditions
- equipment problems
- natural variation
- a genuinely unusual observation
Do not automatically remove an outlier simply because it does not fit the desired model.
Investigate it first.
How Outliers Affect a Model
An outlier can change:
- the estimated slope
- the estimated intercept
- the apparent strength of the relationship
- predictions made from the model
A strong project should mention important outliers and discuss their possible effect.
Evaluating the Strength of a Linear Relationship
A linear relationship appears stronger when points lie close to a straight-line pattern.
A relationship appears weaker when points are widely scattered.
However, visual appearance depends partly on graph scale.
Therefore, conclusions should use several forms of evidence where possible:
- scatter plot
- consistency of rates of change
- residuals
- contextual reasoning
Correlation Does Not Prove Causation
Suppose two variables show a strong linear relationship.
This does not automatically prove that one causes the other.
For example, during summer:
- ice cream sales may increase
- electricity use for air conditioning may increase
The variables may be correlated because both are influenced by temperature.
A modeling project should distinguish between:
association
and:
causation
Collecting Reliable Data
Good models depend on good data.
To improve reliability:
- use appropriate measuring instruments
- use consistent methods
- collect enough observations
- use a useful range of values
- repeat measurements when appropriate
- record data carefully
- use consistent units
- avoid changing multiple conditions unnecessarily
Poor data can produce a poor model even when the mathematics is performed correctly.
Repeated Measurements
Suppose a student measures travel time three times:
2.1 s
2.3 s
2.2 s
The mean is:
(2.1 + 2.3 + 2.2)/3
= 6.6/3
= 2.2 s
Repeated measurements can reduce the influence of random variation.
They also provide information about how consistent the measurements are.
Range of Data
Suppose a student wants to investigate the relationship between mass and spring extension but only measures:
100 g
101 g
102 g
103 g
The range is extremely narrow.
Even if the measurements appear linear, they provide little evidence about the relationship over a wider range.
A well-designed investigation normally uses values spread across the meaningful domain.
Sample Size
Using more observations can provide stronger evidence about a pattern.
A model based on:
2 data points
is much less convincing than a model based on:
15 well-collected observations
Two points always form a line, so they cannot demonstrate by themselves that a real relationship is genuinely linear.
Precision and Accuracy
Precision refers to how closely repeated measurements agree with one another.
Accuracy refers to how close measurements are to the true or accepted value.
A dataset can be:
- precise and accurate
- precise but inaccurate
- imprecise but approximately accurate on average
- neither precise nor accurate
Measurement quality affects the model created from the data.
Project Example: Walking Speed
Research question:
How does distance travelled relate to time when a person walks at a steady pace?
Define:
t = time in seconds
d = distance in metres
Collect distance measurements at regular time intervals.
A possible dataset might be:
| Time (s) | Distance (m) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0.0 |
| 2 | 2.7 |
| 4 | 5.5 |
| 6 | 8.0 |
| 8 | 10.9 |
| 10 | 13.4 |
The data shows an approximately constant increase.
A linear model is likely appropriate.
Creating the Walking Model
Suppose the line of best fit has approximately:
m = 1.35
b = 0
Then:
d ≈ 1.35t
Interpretation:
The walker travels approximately 1.35 metres each second.
This model can be used to estimate distance for other time values within a reasonable range.
Evaluating the Walking Model
Strengths might include:
- data follows a clear straight-line trend
- several measurements were collected
- residuals are small
- slope has a meaningful physical interpretation
Limitations might include:
- walking speed may not remain perfectly constant
- reaction time may affect measurements
- only a short time interval was tested
- the model should not be extrapolated indefinitely
A balanced evaluation discusses both.
Project Example: Filling a Container
Research question:
How does water volume change with filling time when the flow rate is approximately constant?
Define:
t = filling time in seconds
V = volume in mL
Suppose a container initially contains:
100 mL
and water enters at approximately:
25 mL/s
A possible model is:
V ≈ 25t + 100
Slope:
25 mL/s
Intercept:
100 mL
Evaluating the Container Model
The model may work well until the container reaches its capacity.
Suppose the container holds:
600 mL.
Find when the model reaches capacity:
600 = 25t + 100
500 = 25t
t = 20 s
Beyond 20 seconds, the model cannot describe the amount of water inside the container because the container is full.
This is a model limitation.
Project Example: Candle Height
Research question:
How does candle height change with burning time?
Suppose:
h = candle height in cm
t = time in hours
A possible model is:
h ≈ −1.8t + 24
Slope:
−1.8 cm/hour
The candle becomes approximately 1.8 cm shorter each hour.
Intercept:
24 cm
The estimated initial height is 24 cm.
Evaluating the Candle Model
Possible strengths:
- clear decreasing trend
- approximately constant burn rate
- simple interpretation
Possible limitations:
- burn rate may change
- wick conditions may change
- measurements may contain error
- the model cannot continue after the candle is consumed
The equation is useful only within a meaningful domain.
Project Example: Circumference and Diameter
Measure the diameter and circumference of several circular objects.
Define:
d = diameter
C = circumference
Theory predicts:
C = πd
Therefore, a graph of circumference against diameter should be approximately linear.
Its slope should be approximately:
π ≈ 3.14
and the intercept should be close to:
0
Comparing Experimental Results with Theory
Suppose the experimental model is:
C ≈ 3.09d + 0.3
The theoretical relationship is:
C = πd
The experimental slope:
3.09
is reasonably close to:
3.14
The small non-zero intercept might result from:
- measurement uncertainty
- difficulty measuring circumference
- instrument limitations
- imperfect circular objects
This comparison provides mathematical evidence for evaluating the experiment.
Communicating Mathematical Evidence
A conclusion should not simply say:
"The data was linear."
A stronger statement might say:
"The scatter plot showed a clear positive linear trend. The fitted model was d ≈ 1.35t, meaning distance increased by approximately 1.35 m each second. Most measured values were close to the model, with small residuals, so the linear model represented the collected data reasonably well over the tested interval."
This uses evidence rather than opinion.
Evidence That Can Support a Conclusion
Useful mathematical evidence includes:
- tables
- graphs
- slope
- intercept
- equation
- calculated rates
- residuals
- comparisons between observed and predicted values
- discussion of outliers
- domain restrictions
- comparison with theoretical values
A strong report explains what the evidence means.
Graph Requirements for a Project
A good graph should include:
- descriptive title
- independent variable on the x-axis
- dependent variable on the y-axis
- variable names
- units
- appropriate scale
- accurately plotted points
- line of best fit when appropriate
Avoid connecting measured scatter points one-by-one unless there is a specific reason to do so.
A scatter plot and fitted line usually communicate the relationship more clearly.
Tables in a Project Report
A data table should:
- clearly identify variables
- include units in headings
- use consistent formatting
- contain all relevant observations
- avoid unnecessary information
If repeated trials were performed, the table might include:
| Time (s) | Trial 1 (m) | Trial 2 (m) | Trial 3 (m) | Mean Distance (m) |
|---|
The mean values could then be used for the primary graph.
Strengths of a Linear Model
Possible strengths include:
- simple to calculate
- easy to graph
- easy to interpret
- useful for interpolation
- slope has a clear real-world meaning
- fits the observed data closely
- allows comparisons and predictions
A strength should be connected to the actual project rather than listed generically.
Limitations of a Linear Model
Possible limitations include:
- relationship may only be approximately linear
- measurements contain uncertainty
- sample size may be small
- data range may be narrow
- outliers may influence the model
- conditions may change
- model may fail outside the tested range
- physical limits may restrict the domain
- other variables may affect the relationship
A good evaluation identifies limitations specific to the investigation.
Improving the Investigation
After identifying limitations, suggest realistic improvements.
Examples include:
- collect more data points
- increase the range of measurements
- repeat measurements
- use more precise instruments
- control additional variables
- use automated timing
- improve measurement technique
- investigate unusual data points
- repeat the experiment under different conditions
An improvement should address a specific weakness.
Weak vs Strong Evaluation
A weak evaluation might say:
"The experiment could be better."
A stronger evaluation might say:
"Only five measurements were collected over a narrow 4-second interval, making it difficult to determine whether the linear pattern continues. Collecting measurements over a longer time range would provide stronger evidence for the model."
The second statement identifies:
- the limitation
- why it matters
- how to improve it
Project Conclusions
A good conclusion should answer the original research question.
It should include:
- whether a linear relationship was found
- direction of the relationship
- equation of the model
- interpretation of slope
- interpretation of intercept when meaningful
- evidence supporting the model
- one or more predictions
- assessment of reliability
- important limitations
The conclusion should be based on the collected evidence.
Suggested Project Structure
A complete linear modeling project can be organized as follows:
Research Question
State the question clearly.
Variables
Define the independent and dependent variables and units.
Prediction
Describe the expected relationship and explain why.
Method
Explain how data will be collected.
Raw Data
Present measurements clearly.
Processed Data
Include means or calculated quantities if needed.
Graph
Create a scatter plot and appropriate line of best fit.
Linear Model
State the equation.
Interpretation
Explain the slope and intercept.
Prediction
Use the model to calculate a new value.
Evaluation
Discuss model accuracy, residuals, outliers, assumptions, and limitations.
Conclusion
Answer the research question using mathematical evidence.
Possible Linear Modeling Project Ideas
Suitable investigations could include:
- distance travelled vs time while walking
- water volume vs filling time
- water remaining vs draining time
- candle height vs burning time
- circumference vs diameter
- total mass vs number of identical objects
- total cost vs number of identical items
- spring extension vs load within the elastic region
- temperature change over a short controlled interval
- number of stacked objects vs total height
Projects should be chosen so that measurements can be made safely and reliably.
A Complete Mini-Project Example
Question: How does the total height of identical blocks depend on the number of blocks stacked?
Define:
n = number of blocks
H = total height in cm
Suppose the measurements are:
| Blocks | Height (cm) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1 |
| 2 | 4.0 |
| 3 | 6.1 |
| 4 | 8.0 |
| 5 | 10.1 |
| 6 | 12.0 |
The data shows an approximately linear relationship.
A reasonable model is:
H ≈ 2n
Interpreting the Block Model
The slope is approximately:
2 cm/block
This means each additional block increases the stack height by approximately 2 cm.
The intercept is approximately:
0 cm
This makes sense because a stack containing zero blocks should have approximately zero height.
Making a Prediction
Predict the height of:
10 blocks
Using:
H ≈ 2n
H ≈ 2(10)
H ≈ 20 cm
Because 10 blocks is reasonably close to the measured range, this may be a useful prediction if the blocks remain identical and are stacked in the same way.
Evaluating the Mini-Project
Strengths:
The measurements follow a clear linear pattern, the slope has a meaningful interpretation, and the intercept is physically reasonable.
Limitations:
Small measurement errors may occur, the blocks may not be perfectly identical, and a very tall stack could become unstable.
Possible improvement:
Measure each stack several times or use a more precise measuring instrument.
This completes the modeling cycle:
collect → represent → model → predict → evaluate
A Reliable Linear Modeling Workflow
For a complete project:
- Write a clear research question.
- Identify measurable variables.
- Define variables and units.
- Predict the expected relationship.
- Plan a consistent method.
- Collect several data points.
- Repeat measurements when appropriate.
- Organize data in a table.
- Create a scatter plot.
- Look for an approximately linear pattern.
- Identify possible outliers.
- Create a line of best fit.
- Determine its slope.
- Determine its intercept.
- Write the linear model.
- Interpret the slope and intercept.
- Use the model to make a prediction.
- Identify whether the prediction is interpolation or extrapolation.
- Compare predictions with observed values when possible.
- Evaluate residuals and model fit.
- Identify assumptions and limitations.
- Suggest realistic improvements.
- State a conclusion supported by mathematical evidence.
Common Mistakes
Assuming the relationship must be linear
The data should provide evidence for linearity.
Using only two data points
Two points always define a line and provide weak evidence about the real relationship.
Connecting every scatter point
Measured data should usually be represented with a scatter plot and line of best fit rather than a zigzag line connecting every observation.
Forcing the line through the origin
Only use an intercept of zero when the data or context supports it.
Choosing only convenient data
All valid observations should be considered, including unexpected results.
Removing outliers without justification
Investigate unusual measurements before deciding whether they should be excluded.
Ignoring units
Slope must have meaningful units.
Reporting an equation without interpretation
Explain what the slope and intercept mean.
Assuming predictions are exact
A fitted model usually produces estimates.
Extrapolating too far
The relationship may change outside the measured range.
Ignoring residual patterns
Systematic residual patterns may indicate that a linear model is inappropriate.
Listing generic limitations
Limitations should relate directly to the investigation.
Making claims without evidence
Use measurements, calculations, graphs, equations, and residuals to support conclusions.
Key Terms
Linear modeling project — investigation that uses data to create and evaluate a linear mathematical model.
Research question — measurable question guiding an investigation.
Independent variable — input variable placed on the x-axis.
Dependent variable — measured output variable placed on the y-axis.
Dataset — collection of observations or measurements.
Scatter plot — graph showing individual paired data values.
Linear relationship — relationship with a constant or approximately constant rate of change.
Line of best fit — line representing the overall trend of approximately linear data.
Linear model — equation used to represent or approximate a linear relationship.
Slope — rate of change represented by the model.
Intercept — predicted value of the dependent variable when the independent variable is zero.
Prediction — estimated value produced using a model.
Interpolation — prediction within the observed data range.
Extrapolation — prediction outside the observed data range.
Observed value — actual measured value.
Predicted value — value calculated from a model.
Residual — observed value minus predicted value.
Outlier — observation unusually far from the general pattern.
Accuracy — closeness to a true or accepted value.
Precision — consistency among repeated measurements.
Limitation — factor restricting the reliability or usefulness of an investigation or model.
Assumption — condition accepted when constructing or applying a model.
Domain — input values for which a model is intended to apply.
Mathematical evidence — numerical, graphical, or algebraic information used to support a conclusion.
Key Takeaways
- Linear modeling projects begin with data rather than simply being given an equation.
- A strong project starts with a clear, measurable research question.
- Independent and dependent variables should be clearly defined with units.
- Reliable data collection requires careful planning and consistent measurement methods.
- Several observations provide stronger evidence than only two points.
- A scatter plot helps determine whether a relationship is approximately linear.
- Constant or approximately constant rates of change provide evidence for linearity.
- When x-intervals are unequal, compare Δy/Δx rather than changes in y alone.
- Real-world data usually contains some variation.
- A line of best fit represents the overall trend rather than every individual point.
- The linear model can be written in the form y ≈ mx + b when it approximates measured data.
- Slope should be interpreted as a real-world rate with appropriate units.
- The intercept should be interpreted carefully and may not always have practical meaning.
- Models can be used to make predictions.
- Interpolation is usually more reliable than extrapolation.
- Residuals measure differences between observed and predicted values.
- Randomly distributed small residuals can support the use of a linear model.
- Patterns in residuals may indicate that a different model would be more appropriate.
- Outliers should be investigated rather than automatically removed.
- The quality of a model depends partly on the quality and range of the collected data.
- A strong evaluation discusses both strengths and limitations.
- Improvements should directly address identified weaknesses.
- Correlation does not automatically establish causation.
- Models are useful simplifications rather than perfect descriptions of reality.
- Strong conclusions use mathematical evidence rather than unsupported statements.
- A complete project should collect, organize, graph, model, predict, interpret, evaluate, and communicate.
Check Your Understanding
- Explain why collecting only two data points provides weak evidence that a real-world relationship is linear.
- A student investigates how distance travelled changes with time. Identify the likely independent variable, dependent variable, and appropriate units.
- Consider the data:
| x | y |
|---|---|
| 0 | 4.1 |
| 2 | 10.0 |
| 4 | 16.2 |
| 6 | 21.9 |
| 8 | 28.1 |
Explain why a linear model may be appropriate and estimate the rate of change.
- Explain why a scatter plot is usually more appropriate than connecting every measured data point with straight segments in a linear modeling investigation.
- A fitted model is:
V ≈ 18t + 120
where V is volume in mL and t is time in seconds. Interpret the slope and intercept in context.
- A model predicts 42.6 while the measured value is 44.1. Calculate the residual using observed − predicted and interpret the result.
- Data was collected for x-values from 0 to 20. Explain why predicting at x = 12 is generally more reliable than predicting at x = 100.
- A scatter plot contains one point far from the general linear pattern. Give three possible explanations for the outlier and explain what should be done before removing it.
- A model has small residuals, but every residual is positive. What might this suggest about the model?
- Explain why a curved pattern in a scatter plot would provide evidence against using a linear model.
- A student measures the circumference and diameter of circular objects and obtains the model:
C ≈ 3.11d + 0.2
Compare this with the theoretical relationship C = πd. Discuss what the slope and intercept suggest about the experiment.
- A student states, "My model is good because my graph looks straight." Identify at least three additional pieces of mathematical evidence that could strengthen this conclusion.
- Design a simple linear modeling investigation using materials available in a classroom. State the research question, independent variable, dependent variable, units, and the data you would collect.
- A model fits measurements very closely between x = 2 and x = 12. A student claims that it must therefore remain accurate until x = 10,000. Evaluate this conclusion.
- Imagine you have completed a project investigating how the height of a candle changes with burning time. Describe what should be included in a strong final conclusion, including the equation, slope interpretation, evidence for linearity, prediction, strengths, limitations, and possible improvements.
5. Capstone Algebra Project
Learning outcomes
- I can apply algebraic concepts to a complex real-world problem.
- I can select appropriate equations, inequalities, and graphs for modeling.
- I can analyze and interpret mathematical results.
- I can communicate mathematical reasoning clearly.
- I can evaluate and improve my mathematical model based on evidence.